Chittagong: 62 for 5Englands seven-Test marathon began in Bangladeshs port city and they only just managed to stay afloat. They had a narrow lead heading into their second innings which was almost squandered. Shakib Al Hasan, who had formed a twin new-ball spin attack with teenager Mehedi Hasan, claimed three including the key wicket of Joe Root. In the end, Ben Stokes superb 85 gave them just enough to defend but it was a warning sign of what was to come.Dhaka: 69 for 5 and 10 for 64Those warning signs that flashed in Chittagong, blared at full volume a few days later in Dhaka. In the first innings England lost the top half of their innings for 69 - after Bangladesh themselves had lost 9 for 49 - before the lower order managed to haul them to a small lead. But there was no escape second time around as they lost all ten wickets for 64 in 22.2 gruesome overs after Alastair Cook and Ben Duckett had opened with an aggressive stand of 100 in 23 overs. It all changed first ball after tea on the third evening when Mehedi speared one through Duckett. It turned into a magical afternoon for Mehedi as he secured match figures of 12 for 159 - the best by a Bangladesh bowler in Tests. It was a shock England would never really recover from.Visakhapatnam: 80 for 5 and 10 for 83After brief respite in Rajkot, where they pushed India hard, the worst fears about England in India started to come to fruition. In the face of Indias 455 the match was basically lost in the final session of the second day. Mohammad Shamis pearler to Cook began the first slide, but the run out of Haseeb Hameed and Roots carve into the deep were self-inflicted. Faced with five sessions to secure a draw, England opted for the blockathon approach as Cook and Hameed added 75 in 50 overs before a grubber trapped Hameed lbw. Then, with what became the final ball of the fourth day, Cook was lbw to Ravindra Jadeja which meant the last morning began with the vulnerable Duckett in the middle rather than their captain. Despite having eight wickets in hand there was an air of inevitably and the match ended shortly after lunch: all 10 wickets had gone in 47 overs.Mohali: 107 for 6Despite an underwhelming first innings, England were still in the contest when they removed Virat Kohli to leave India 204 for 6. But the last four wickets added 213 and England went into bat again starring at a deficit of 134 instead of somewhere near parity. Still, it was not entirely beyond the realms of possibility that India could be left with a testing chase but that notion disappeared as they fell to 78 for 4 on the third evening - the batting order having been reshuffled due to Hameeds broken finger. They slipped further on the fourth day before a modicum of pride of restored through Hameeds gritty defiance, but the damage - in every sense - had long since been done. And it wasnt just spin that did them on this occasion, Shami producing a rapid new-ball burst to break the belated resistance. Mumbai: 6 for 15Rarely had a total of 400 been made to look so inadequate (well, at least until England outdid themselves a week later in Chennai) as Kohli made a career-best 235 alongside M Vijays century and Jayant Yadavs stylish maiden hundred - Indias first by a No. 9. As in Vizag, England were eyeing parity with India 307 for 6 only for them to return to the crease 231 runs behind. They played their shots, in a forlorn hope to set India some sort of final-day target, but from the moment Stokes fell shortly before the close on the fourth day the lower order was zapped for just 15 runs as R Ashwin claimed an astonishing 6 for 7 in 37 balls.Chennai: 10 for 104 including 6 for 15Was there time for one final collapse? There sure was. At lunch on the final day in Chennai it appeared England had managed to restore a small sense of order after being pummelled for 759 by Indias batsmen. Cook and Keaton Jennings had reached the first break on 97 without loss with two sessions left to leave having shown some fight. Yet, in the end, India won with time to spare. Cook fell to his nemesis, Jadeja, for a sixth time in the series then a raft of soft shots from Jonny Bairstow, Moeen Ali and Stokes led to a swift unravelling. It was fitting that the final two wickets of the series fell in the space of four deliveries. Now all that was left was for England to collapse into the plane seats for the journey home.China Jerseys 2020 . Howard Ganz, an MLB lawyer, said in a letter to U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos that Rodriguezs claims do not come "remotely close" to what is needed to overturn an arbitration decision in federal court. Wholesale Jerseys 2020 . LOUIS -- Theres no telling how these wacky World Series games will end. https://www.wholesalejerseysreview.com/ . Pettersen, winner of last years Evian Championships, had nine birdies and three bogeys, holding off a series of challengers led by Marion Ricordeau of France. The second-ranked Norwegian made her season debut after missing the LPGA Tours opening event last month in the Bahamas because of a shoulder injury. Wholesale China Jerseys Free Shipping . LOUIS -- Theres no telling how these wacky World Series games will end. Wholesale Jerseys Review . -- Chicago Bears cornerback Tim Jennings was selected Monday to his second straight Pro Bowl, while guard Kyle Long made it after a solid rookie season.Whether the heavyweight world title fight between Anthony Joshua and Wladimir Klitschko is finalized hinges solely on whether the WBA will sanction the bout, Klitschkos manager told ESPN on Tuesday.Bernd Boente and Joshuas promoter, Eddie Hearn of Matchroom Boxing, have both said the fight terms are agreed to for what would be a Dec. 10 megafight at the Manchester Arena in Manchester, England. However, it was stipulated by both sides from the outset that they would only make the fight if another major title was at stake besides the IBF version Joshua holds.Klitschko lost the IBF, WBA and WBO titles to Tyson Fury by decision in a massive upset last November. The IBF stripped Fury of the title 10 days later for agreeing to a contractually obligated rematch with Klitschko rather than fight a mandatory challenger. Joshua eventually won that belt.When the troubled Fury pulled out of the Oct. 29 rematch with Klitschko because of a cocaine problem -- he failed two drug tests -- heavy drinking and mental health issues, the Joshua and Klitschko camps began negotiating the fight, figuring the titles would eventually become vacant with Fury unable to defend.Last week, Fury vacated the titles, but neither the WBO nor the WBA has officially ruled on how it will fill the vacancies.The WBO has no plans to approve Joshua-Klitschko for its vacant title. WBO president Francisco Paco Valcarcel told ESPN he wants there to be a four-man box-off among the organizations highest-ranked contenders to fill the title. The matter is scheduled to be decided Thursday during the WBOs annual convention in San Juan, Puerto Rico.The Klitschko and Joshua camps have both asked the WBA to sanction the bout, but WBA president Gilberto Mendoza Jr. has yet to respond. Mendoza also has not responded to repeated requests from ESPN for comment, but the matter is expected to be decided soon.So Joshua and Klitschko are awaiting the WBA ruling. If the WBA declines to sanction the bout, Boente said the fight will not happen this year and that Klitschko would instead fight for the vacant WBA belt on Dec. 10 at the Barclaycard Arena, which is on hold, in Hamburg, Germany.Klitschkos probable opponent for that fight would be Australian contender Lucas Browne (24-0, 21 KOs), who won the WBAs secondary title by comeback 10th-round knockout of Ruslan Chagaev in March. Browne was quickly stripped of the title and suspended because of a positive doping test for clenbuterol in a sample taken a few days before the fight.We will go with the WBA ruling, Boente said. We hope they rule quickly because Dec. 10 is not far away.According to Boente, Klitschkos adviser, Shelly Finkel, and Brownes adviser, Leon Margules, have been negotiating the fight so they can be ready to go should the WBA decline to sanction Joshua-Klitschko.ddddddddddddFor Wladimir it is very important to have the WBA title in a fight with Joshua, Boente said. We made a deal with Eddie easily. We tried to find an agreement and we made a deal. If the fight doesnt happen now and Wladimir and Joshua both win their next fight, we can do the fight under the same deal next year and it would be even bigger. The framework is there.A fight with the 27-year-old Joshua (17-0, 17 KOs), regardless of which belts are stake, would be worth millions of dollars more to Klitschko (64-4, 54 KOs) than one against Browne. Boente said RTL, Klitschkos German television partner, would pay half as much for a fight with Browne, 37, as it would for Joshua.A Joshua-Klitschko bout would also generate a pay-per-view bonanza on Sky Box Office in Joshuas home country of England, where he is a pay-per-view star. But Boente said it is not only about money for Klitschko.For Wladimir, its also about the WBA title. For him, this is important, Boente said. It is his mission. He is serious when he says it is not only about the money.If they cant get everything worked out in time for Dec. 10 Klitschko -- already out of action for a year while waiting on the Fury rematch that was ultimately canceled -- would not fight until March or April. The reason is because that is the earliest RTL could accommodate a Klitschko fight next year, Boente said.As for the WBO, which ranks the 40-year-old Klitschko No. 2, he would be invited into a four-man box-off, but Boente said he is not interested in an elimination fight.The WBO wants a tournament, which is up to them, Boente said. We love the WBO. Wladimir held the WBO title for a long time and it was the first world title he won. He respects the WBO, but if they do a tournament Wladimir would not participate. At this stage of his career it makes no sense.If a Joshua-Klitschko fight is finalized, Boente said one of the major hurdles has been cleared -- the matter of American television. Klitschko has a contract with HBO and Joshua has one with rival Showtime. He said an agreement was made on that front but declined to specify how a U.S. broadcast would be handled, although a source with knowledge of the agreement told ESPN that the camps have made a two-fight deal under which Showtime would get the U.S. broadcast rights to the first fight and HBO would have the rights to a rematch.Showtime Sports general manager Stephen Espinoza and HBO Sports executive vice president Peter Nelson both declined to comment on the resolution. ' ' '